Every few years, someone declares gaming dead. “Consoles are dying.” “PC gaming is over.” “Mobile killed real games.” I’ve been hearing this since 2010 and gaming is still here — bigger than ever. But 2026 feels different. The layoffs are unprecedented, AAA budgets are unsustainable, and players are exhausted by monetization. So is this actually the end? No. But it might be the end of gaming as we know it — and that could be a good thing.
Updated April 2026.
What’s Actually Dying
The AAA Blockbuster Model
Games that cost $200-300 million to make are unsustainable. When a game needs to sell 10 million copies to break even, every game is a gamble. Suicide Squad, Concord, and Redfall all failed spectacularly, costing their publishers hundreds of millions. I don’t think the AAA model is dead, but the era of $300 million budgets is ending. The math doesn’t work. Publishers will either reduce budgets or reduce frequency. Probably both.
The Annual Release Cycle
Players are tired of yearly sequels. Call of Duty, Assassin’s Creed, and FIFA/EFC release every year and the fatigue is real. I used to buy every Assassin’s Creed. Now I skip most of them. The quality is fine, but the experience is repetitive. Ubisoft’s financial struggles reflect this fatigue. Annual releases worked when games were simpler and cheaper. They don’t work when each game costs $100 million and players expect 100+ hours of content.
The $70 Price Point
$70 for a base game, $30-50 for a season pass, $10-20 for cosmetic DLC. A “complete” AAA game now costs $100-140. I’ve stopped buying games at launch because of this. I wait for sales, buy used, or subscribe to Game Pass. I’m not alone — physical game sales are declining and players are waiting for discounts. The $70 price point is pushing players toward cheaper alternatives.
What’s Thriving
Indie Games
Indie games have never been better. Balatro, Hades II, Animal Well, 1000xResist — these are some of the best games of 2025-2026, and they cost $15-30. I get more enjoyment from a $20 indie game than most $70 AAA titles. The indie scene is the future of creative gaming. Small teams, low budgets, high creativity. This is where the best ideas are happening.
AA Games
The “AA” space — games with mid-range budgets ($10-50 million) — is growing. Helldivers 2, Palworld, and Lethal Company proved that you don’t need a $200 million budget to make a hit. These games are polished but not bloated, creative but not risky, and priced fairly. I see this as the sweet spot for the industry. Enough budget for quality, not so much that failure is catastrophic.
Retro and Retro-Style Games
Retro gaming is booming. Pixel art, CRT filters, and 8-bit soundtracks are everywhere. I play retro-style games regularly — they’re focused, polished, and respect my time. Games like Celeste, Hollow Knight, and Shovel Knight prove that “retro” doesn’t mean “simple.” It means “focused.” The retro aesthetic is a reaction against bloated AAA design.
What’s Changing
How We Play
We’re playing differently. Shorter sessions, more games, less commitment. I used to play one game for months. Now I play 3-4 games simultaneously, switching based on mood. The Steam Deck and handheld PCs made this easier — I can play anywhere, in any position, for 20 minutes or 2 hours. Gaming is becoming more casual and more flexible.
How We Pay
Subscriptions, free-to-play, and sales are replacing the $70 purchase. Game Pass, PS Plus, and Epic free games mean I rarely pay full price. This is better for my wallet but worse for developers who depend on launch sales. The economics are shifting and nobody knows where they’ll land.
How Games Are Made
AI tools, better engines, and smaller teams are changing development. A game that took 200 people in 2016 might take 50 people in 2026 with AI assistance. I don’t think AI will replace developers, but it will change what’s possible with smaller teams. This could be great for indie and AA — more ambition with fewer resources.
My Final Thoughts
Gaming isn’t dying. It’s changing. The AAA blockbuster model is unsustainable, but indie games, AA games, and retro-style games are thriving. I’m optimistic about the future of gaming — just not the future of $300 million budgets and annual sequels. The best games I’ve played recently cost $20 and were made by teams of 10-50 people. That’s the future I want. The end of “gaming as we know it” might be the beginning of something better.
Continue reading:
